It's all over. The 13th Assembly of the Uniting Church concluded today after seven days of worship, celebration, debate, decision making, conversations and way, way too much eating. It feels like I disappeared into a bubble for seven days and now as I fly home I prepare for re-entry into the real world. For the last week I did not travel more than 500 meters or so from the hotel in which we met and where I had a room, apart from a couple of early morning walks at the beginning of the week. There is a certain rhythm to Assembly - breakfast, worship, bible study, morning tea, business, a lunch hour and a half crowded with optional activities, more business, afternoon tea, more business, dinner wherever, more business, more food (I dread getting on the scales when I get home) and finally, collapse into bed. I'm pooped.
This was the fifth time I have attended an Assembly meeting. I am not sure can say it was the most enjoyable, as I am not sure I can actually say I 'enjoy' weeklong meetings. Having said this, there were a number of experiences of the week that were inspiring and profoundly enjoyable, including the leadership offered by our indigenous members, the presence of, and remarkable stories from our international partners and the opportunities to worship with new and old friends. In addition there were some distinct and positive differences that distinguished this Assembly from previous ones I attended, not just that this was the first time we have met in a hotel (big tick from me - I like my creature comforts!)
The 13th Assembly marked the first time in my experience we have successfully worked through all the business of the agenda, and without the need to proceed to formal meeting procedures. All decisions were made by consensus or agreement - a remarkable achievement when I think about it. To be sure, with the deadlines for new proposals closing 30 days out from the start of our meeting, we did not have the sheer weight of business we have had in the past. However, there were some weighty and contentious issues before us, like a process to discuss the recognition or otherwise of same-gender relationships, and the oversight of ministerial formation, the conversation around wither of which could have ground to a halt without any substantive decisions being made. The fact we successfully worked through these issues, and other complex matters witnesses to the spirit of openness, humility and careful listening in the room, as well as the thoughtful and pastoral leadership of our President, Andrew Dutney and our General Secretary, Terence Corkin. Of course the prayers of many across the church, and the gracious work of God's Holy Spirit were paramount.
Finally to matters regarding the vexed and pastorally difficult questions of same-gender relationships and their recognition and validation or otherwise in the Uniting Church. After receiving three quite different proposals, and following a couple of hours of very sensitive debate, the Assembly facilitation task group offered the meeting a way forward that was agreed to. In the end we first decided to acknowledge that the church has a stated and current position on marriage that was determined by the 10th Assembly meeting in 1997. Amongst many things this comprehensive statement offers is that the church's position is that marriage is between a man and a woman. You can read the church’s stated position on marriage in a ‘Doc Byte’ document issued by the Doctrine working group, which can be downloaded here: http://assembly.uca.org.au/docbytes.
Having acknowledged the church's current position, the Assembly then directed the Doctrine working group to facilitate a discussion across the diversity of the church around marriage that in the end will enable the Assembly Standing Committee to report back to the 14th Assembly in three years time in Perth. The substance and format of that report, and whether it will include any recommendations, has not been determined. The process established is open ended, including its duration. This conversation could well take longer than three years. It is also a conversation that I will be engaged in all the way through, having been elected to the Assembly Standing Committee for the next three years.
I am pleased with the decisions we have made. I believe they are good decisions. I am pleased we have acknowledged that before we start such a sensitive journey, the church does have a starting point which is the decisions made at the 10th Assembly. Our position may well not change in any substantive ways, even after extensive conversations and prayerful listening over the next few years. I am also pleased we are having a conversation that recognizes that what we say about marriage and human relationships is a profoundly theological concern grounded in the doctrine of the church. Given the debate that is raging in the public square all around us, as a church we must be courageous enough to talk about such matters so that with humility we can bear witness to Christ to our community.
I am pleased and I am scared. I am scared where this may take us. The potential for schism is real. This conversation goes to the heart of deeply held convictions, on both 'sides' of the debate. For almost twenty years now I have listened, prayed, read widely and agonized, and still my convictions remain essential the same; that God's good gift of sexuality is to be expressed in its fullest sense only within the covenant of marriage between a man and a woman, made before God. There are many sisters and brothers in Christ whom I love and respect, and I know who love and respect me, who have differing convictions. I want to humbly listen to their wisdom and be open to changing my views, however large or small those changes might be, hoping they will bring the same openness to the conversation. In all of this I pray that God might lead us deeper into Truth, and by the Holy Spirit we might have the courage to go there.
In all of this I have a hopeful question; is it possible for the Uniting Church to create space for its theological diversity to be held together with integrity? The differences are real and profound. Is there another way we can be church together that allows for profound differences to be recognized and respected, if not agreed with? I honestly don’t know, but hope that it might be possible. As we continue to what many call a ‘post denominational age’ (whatever that means), we will discover the answers to these and many other questions. In the meantime, I will pray. I will thank God daily that the Uniting Church is the sometimes dysfunctional family in which God has placed me, and I will earnestly ask that God the Trinity of Love will hold all things together, including this part of God’s church.